Advertisement

Judge orders Iowa DNR to re-do Supreme Beef NMP

Error message

  • Warning: array_merge(): Expected parameter 1 to be an array, bool given in _simpleads_render_ajax_template() (line 133 of /home/pdccourier/www/www/sites/all/modules/simpleads/includes/simpleads.helper.inc).
  • Notice: Trying to get property 'settings' of non-object in _simpleads_adgroup_settings() (line 343 of /home/pdccourier/www/www/sites/all/modules/simpleads/includes/simpleads.helper.inc).
  • Warning: array_merge(): Expected parameter 1 to be an array, bool given in _simpleads_render_ajax_template() (line 157 of /home/pdccourier/www/www/sites/all/modules/simpleads/includes/simpleads.helper.inc).
  • Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type null in include() (line 24 of /home/pdccourier/www/www/sites/all/modules/simpleads/templates/simpleads_ajax_call.tpl.php).

The Iowa Department of Natural Resources (DNR) made numerous errors when approving a plan for the handling of manure from an 11,600-head cattle operation in the headwaters of Clayton County’s Bloody Run Creek, according to a ruling April 28 by Polk County District Judge Scott Rosenberg. 

 

In response to a challenge by the Iowa Chapter of the Sierra Club and the Iowa State Council of Trout Unlimited (TU), the judge ordered the DNR to reconsider the nutrient management plan (NMP) for Supreme Beef LLC near Monona. The ruling does not prevent the feedlot from continuing to operate.

 

“Sierra Club is pleased that judge Rosenberg gave this case the thorough review that it deserved,” said Wally Taylor, attorney for the Sierra Club. “We hope that the DNR got the message that its discretion is not unlimited and that it must follow its own rules.”

 

Bloody Run Creek is a popular trout stream, sustaining naturally reproducing brown trout. It also has been designated an “Outstanding Iowa Water” by the DNR.

 

Rosenberg agreed with Sierra Club in his April 28 ruling, which reversed the DNR’s approval of the nutrient management plan. The judge said the DNR’s approval of the nutrient management plan was “illogical” in several ways:

 

• Allowing a manure sample from a different kind of operation to be used in calculating the amount of nutrients that would be in the Supreme Beef manure.

 

• Using that manure sample in conjunction with a table value that had no relationship to the sample.

 

• Failing to properly consider all types of soil erosion from the crop fields where the Supreme Beef manure would be applied.

 

• Allowing Supreme Beef to avoid describing in the nutrient management plan how the storage basin would be adequate to hold all of the manure produced.

 

In addition, Rosenberg held that the Supreme Beef storage basin could not be constructed in a floodway. But he said he had no jurisdiction in this case, while reviewing the nutrient management plan, to determine that the basin is in a floodway. 

 

Supreme Beef co-owners Jared, Dean and Mike Walz submitted the NMP in 2020. After several revisions—and a discussion between DNR director Kayla Lyon and state senator Dan Zumbach, who is the father-in-law of Jared Walz—the DNR approved the NMP in February 2021. Cattle were moved into the facility later that year.

 

The livestock operation has been controversial since construction started in March 2017. There were conflicts over the need for a stormwater construction permit, and the DNR assessed several fines against the operation. DNR staff asked to turn the case over to the Iowa Attorney General’s office for further legal action, but the Iowa Environmental Protection Commission declined to take action.

 

Challengers say this case brings to light several points. Supreme Beef, and perhaps other livestock facilities, have operations that do not come within the scope of Iowa’s rules. They believe the DNR is willing to ignore or misapply the rules to accommodate non-complying feeding operations such as Supreme Beef. The rules themselves are often vague and confusing, which they said may be by design.

 

The language of the judge’s ruling demonstrated how complicated and confusing the state laws and administrative rules can be. Rosenberg used the terms “strange,” “odd” and “illogical” when describing the DNR’s approach to approving the NMP.  

 

“. . . the NMP in question is overwhelmingly marked with illogical interpretations and applications,” Rosenberg concluded.

 

Taylor, the Sierra Club attorney, said it’s uncertain what the next action will be.

 

“The judge ruled in our favor on some of our claims but not others,” he said. “DNR and/or Supreme Beef can move for reconsideration, appeal to the Iowa Supreme Court or go back and do the NMP over.”

 

 

Rate this article: 
No votes yet